Skip to Content

What are the three colors for heatmap?

Heatmaps are visual representations of data using color to indicate different values. They allow you to see patterns, trends, and relationships in data at a glance. When creating a heatmap, choosing the right colors is important for effectively communicating the meaning behind the data. There are three main colors commonly used in heatmaps: red, yellow, and blue.


Red is the color used to represent high or hot values in a heatmap. It draws the viewer’s eye and indicates data points of interest. Red typically signifies values that are above a defined threshold or average. For example, in a heatmap of website traffic, red may indicate pages with the highest number of visitors. Or in a sales heatmap, red could show products with the most sales.

Red has a strong visual impact and associations with heat, importance, and intensity. This makes it a logical choice for highlighting high values you want to stand out in a heatmap. It provides an intuitive color cue that the viewer can grasp quickly. Keep in mind that too much red saturation can overwhelm a heatmap. But when used effectively, a vivid red directs focus and enables rapid pattern recognition.


Yellow is used as the middle color in heatmaps, representing values in the mid-range. It sits between the hot red tones and cooler blue tones. Yellow draws less attention than red but more than blue. It is indicative of data points that are moderate or average in the context of the full dataset.

Some common uses of yellow in heatmaps include:

– Website pages or products with a medium level of traffic/sales
– Data clusters with an average density or size
– Geographic areas with middling concentrations of a variable (e.g. population)

Yellow works well as a neutral transitional color leading the viewer’s eyes from areas of intensity (red) to areas of low activity (blue). The bright yellow captures attention without overwhelming the graphic. Subtle variations in the saturation of yellow can also represent more fine-grained distinctions in the middle of the data spectrum.


Blue represents lower or cooler values in a heatmap. It is the opposite end of the spectrum from hot red tones. Blue indicates data points that are below a defined average or threshold. For example, in a sales heatmap, blue could signify underperforming products or markets. In a heatmap of website activity, blue might show pages with low visitor traffic.

Cool blue hues recede visually and don’t attract focus like warm reds and yellows. This makes blue ideal for deemphasizing parts of the heatmap that are less significant to understanding patterns in the data. Different shades of blue, ranging from dark to light, can encode varying degrees of low values. Sparse use of saturated blues also helps draw attention to peaks of red activity.

Blue evokes associations with coolness, calmness, and quietness. Used thoughtfully, it can be an intuitive indicator of lowered activity, importance, or intensity in a heatmap. It provides crucial contrast from red areas and gives shape to the overall data landscape.

Color Sequence Matters

When designing a heatmap, the sequence of colors from high to low values matters. Following the convention of arranging color hues from warm to cool moving down the data spectrum creates an intuitive heatmap.

The standard sequence is:

– Red – Indicates high values
– Yellow – Represents mid-range values
– Blue – Signals low values

It is best practice to use red-yellow-blue in this order for heatmaps. The warmth of the red naturally draws the eye to areas of interest in the data. Yellow serves as a logical bridge between hot red and cool blue zones. And blue recedes to deemphasize low data points without hiding them entirely.

Deviating from this sequence can confuse the viewer. For example, using blue for high values and red for low values defies common color associations. While creative uses of color may be aesthetically pleasing, they can obscure the meaning your heatmap is intended to communicate.

Additional Color Tips

Here are some additional tips for effective use of color in heatmaps:

– Use only one hue of red, yellow and blue. Vary saturation instead of hue for granular distinctions. Too many colors compete for attention.

– Make sure there is sufficient visual contrast between hues. Don’t use red, orange, and yellow for example.

– Add white or black to pastel hues to darken or lighten the colors if needed. Avoid extremely light or saturated shades.

– Consider colorblind-friendly palettes if your heatmap will be viewed by those with color vision deficiencies. Test colors using a colorblindness simulator.

– Use a color key alongside the heatmap to define what each color represents. Don’t make viewers guess.

– Keep the number of defined color bins small, typically 3 to 5 bins. Too many colors create a noisy heatmap.

– Make sure colors align logically with the data being visualized. Using red for low values defies user expectation.

– Use software to generate your heatmap colors. Don’t hand pick colors without considering value distribution.

When to Use Other Colors

While red, yellow and blue are standard, other colors can provide effective variety:

– **Green** can represent a fourth bin in some heatmaps when needed. It is easy to distinguish from red, yellow, and blue.

– **Purple** tones may also work as a fourth color option. Use lighter shades to maintain visibility.

– **Orange** sits between red and yellow as a warmer hue. It can replace yellow in some heatmaps depending on other colors used.

– **Black and white** grayscale heatmaps ditch color entirely. This clean look works for some professional contexts.

– **Diverging palettes** use two distinct hues like blue and red to show value extremes, with a neutral color like white in the middle.

In specific contexts, there may be logical reasons to deviate from the standard red-yellow-blue heatmap color scheme. But use discretion, as too many colors can overwhelm and distort data insights. Evaluate if alternative colors aid or detract from quick visual comprehension.

Tools to Create Heatmaps

Many tools exist to generate heatmaps, including:

– Microsoft Excel using conditional formatting
– Data visualization software like Tableau
– Web development frameworks like D3.js
– Adobe Illustrator, Photoshop, and other design programs

These tools automate the process of assigning color values and producing the heatmap graphic. This saves designers from hand-picking colors and placing data points. The software also handles generating a color key and data classifications.

For example, Tableau’s conditional formatting lets you define rules, color palettes, breaks, and data bin ranges. It will produce an optimized colormap based on your data and preferences. This enhances creation of accurate, unbiased heatmaps.

Leveraging software takes the guesswork out of heatmap creation. The programs handle the meticulous details of scaling and normalizing color mappings. This leaves designers free to focus on effectively communicating the heatmap insights.

When to Use Heatmaps

Heatmaps provide an at-a-glance view of pattern intensities and data hot spots. Their color coding highlights activity clusters, making them useful for:

– Understanding usage or traffic flow on websites
– Optimizing store layouts based on shopper movements
– Visualizing areas of health risks based on disease data
– Determining sales territories that need more focus
– Identifying patterns and correlations in large datasets

Heatmaps condense complex data into simple visual cues. By leveraging innate mental associations with color, they allow rapid interpretation of data landscapes. This explains why heatmaps are applied across so many domains for data analysis and communication.

Limitations of Heatmaps

Heatmaps excel at providing bird’s-eye perspectives of data patterns. However, there are some limitations to consider:

– Pixelation can occur, losing nuance when summarizing large datasets.

– Sparsely populated maps are less meaningful than dense ones.

– They lack granularity, only showing general data clusters.

– Color associations may differ across cultural contexts.

– Colorblind viewers may misunderstand color codings.

– Choices like color bins and scales can distort data perception.

Due to these limitations, heatmaps typically serve as a starting point for understanding data distributions. They work best complemented by raw data views, statistical summaries, graphs, and other detailed breakdowns. This provides necessary context and nuance for interpreting the broad patterns shown in a heatmap.


Red, yellow and blue form the standard color palette for heatmaps. Following best practices for color selection, sequence, and contrast creates heatmaps that effectively highlight patterns in data. While other colors can occasionally be useful, sticking to the standard trio as primary hues ensures intuitive interpretation. Matching warmer hues like red to higher values and cooler blues to lower values aligns with viewer expectations. With smart color choices and design options, heatmaps unlock simple insights into complex data sets. They distill multivariate information down to color-coded visual cues for rapid analysis.


[1] Yau, N. (2011). Visualize this: The FlowingData guide to design, visualization, and statistics. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.

[2] Heer, J., & Stone, M. (2012). Color naming models for color selection, image editing and palette design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1007-1016). ACM.

[3] Mittelstädt, S., Stoffel, A., & Keim, D. A. (2014, May). Methods for compensating contrast effects in information visualization. In Computer Graphics Forum (Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 231-240).

[4] Cole, B. L., Lian, K. Y., & Lakkis, C. (2006). The new Richmond HRR pseudoisochromatic test for colour vision is better than the Ishihara test. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 89(2), 73-80.

[5] Brewer, C. A. (1994). Color use guidelines for data representation. Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Graphics, American Statistical Association, 55-60.

[6] Light, A., & Bartlein, P. J. (2004). The end of the rainbow? Color schemes for improved data graphics. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 85(40), 385-391.

[7] Wong, B. (2010). Color blindness. Nature Methods, 7(8), i.