Skip to Content

How do we see yellow without yellow cones?

How do we see yellow without yellow cones?

Human color vision relies on specialized retinal cells called cones. There are three main types of cones that are each sensitive to different wavelengths of light – short (blue), medium (green), and long (red). The combination of signals from these three cone types allows us to perceive the visible color spectrum. However, there is no cone type that is specifically sensitive to yellow light. This raises an interesting question – if we have no cones dedicated to detecting yellow, how are we able to see the color yellow?

The Trichromatic Theory of Color Vision

In 1802, the English scientist Thomas Young proposed the trichromatic theory of color vision. This theory states that our perception of all possible colors is enabled by the combined activity of the three cone types. The cones each detect a range of wavelengths, with peak sensitivities in the blue, green, and red regions of the spectrum. According to the trichromatic theory, yellow is perceived when the medium wavelength cones (green) and the long wavelength cones (red) are stimulated in the appropriate proportion, without significant stimulation of the short wavelength cones (blue).

The trichromatic theory was later verified experimentally by measuring the absorption spectra of the cone pigments. The peak absorptions were found to correspond roughly to violet, green, and yellow light. So even though there is no cone type devoted exclusively to yellow, the green and red cones together enable us to see yellow through their combined patterns of activation.

Opponent Process Theory of Color Vision

The trichromatic theory explains how we can perceive all colors using only three cone types. However, it does not fully capture the subjective experience of color. For example, we do not perceive yellow as a type of reddish-green. This led to refinements in color theory such as the opponent process model proposed in the 1950s.

According to opponent process theory, the visual system encodes color information using three opposing axes:

– Red vs. Green
– Blue vs. Yellow
– Black vs. White (light vs. dark)

So while the trichromatic theory describes how the cones detect light signals, the opponent process theory proposes additional neural processing steps. The cone signals are combined into opponent channels, including a red-green channel and a blue-yellow channel.

This model accounts for the fact that we perceive yellow as distinctly different from red and green. The yellow perception arises from excitation of the blue-yellow channel, while suppression of the red-green channel distinguishes it from reddish or greenish hues. So theopponent organization of color encoding in the visual system shapes our subjective experience of yellow as a distinct color.

Color Opponency and Retinal Ganglion Cells

Recent neurophysiological studies have provided insight into how opponent color signals arise in the retina. The first site of color opponency has been localized to the retinal ganglion cells. These cells collect signals from cones and relay processed visual information to the brain.

There are multiple types of retinal ganglion cells. Some act as red-green color opponent neurons, others signal blue-yellow opponency. So cell-based experiments have validated that color opponency emerges early, as predicted by opponent process theory.

The mechanisms generating color opponency rely on the patterns of connectivity between cones and ganglion cells. Red-green ganglion cells receive input from both long (red) and medium (green) wavelength cones. But the sign of the input differs – red cones have excitatory synapses, while green cones connect via inhibitory synapses. This creates an opposing response to reddish vs greenish light. An analogous wiring scheme produces blue-yellow color opponency.

So even without a cone devoted to yellow, retinal circuits allow ganglion cells to signal the presence of yellow by exciting the blue-yellow channel. These early neural transformations allow us to perceive yellow as a distinct color.

Cortical Processing of Color Information

Beyond the retina, color signals undergo further processing in the visual cortex. Studies of cortical neurons have identified cells selective for specific colors, including some that preferentially respond to yellow stimuli. These neurons are thought to arise from combining the cone inputs in diverse ways, then further refining color representations.

However, the principles of color opponency established in the retina remain partially preserved in cortical processing. Imaging studies show that reddish colors tend to activate certain regions of visual cortex, while greenish colors stimulate adjacent zones. This reflects the maintenance of a red-green color axis. Similarly, bluish and yellowish colors evoke responses in distinct cortical regions, consistent with blue-yellow opponency.

So cortical mechanisms expand upon the retinal color processing pathways to enable complex color perception and recognition. But the fundamental opponency between reddish/greenish and bluish/yellowish hues continues to shape the neural representation of color in the visual cortex. This cortical architecture ultimately allows us to discern yellow as a distinct perceptual category.

Cross-Cultural Studies of Color Perception

The previous sections explained how biological mechanisms of trichromatic color vision and opponent processing allow us to see yellow without dedicated yellow-tuned cones. But could cultural or linguistic factors also influence our perception of yellow? Cross-cultural studies have probed this question.

Researchers have compared color discrimination abilities across cultures. For example, a 2015 study tested color matching performance among the Himba people of northern Namibia, who have limited color terminology compared to English. Surprisingly, the Himba people excelled at discriminating shades of green, despite lacking a word for green. However, they performed worse than English speakers at discriminating blue shades.

So language does not alter low-level sensory discrimination for colors, which relies on the biological visual system we all share. However, language does affect memory and categorical perception of colors. Having separate terms for green and blue shapes the mental representation of these color boundaries for English speakers.

Cross-language studies also reveal that all cultures tend to lexicalize certain colors frequently (black, white, red, green, yellow and blue). This likely reflects universal perceptual salience of these colors. So while language impacts higher-level color cognition, retinal and cortical mechanisms shape the universal perceptual experience of yellow across cultures. The visual system ensures we can identify yellow objects regardless of how color terms vary between languages.

Mechanisms Compensating for Yellow Cone Loss

A final line of evidence on the biological basis of yellow perception comes from studying individuals with missing or non-functional cone types. For example, blue cone monochromacy is a condition where the green and red cones are absent. These individuals can still perceptually differentiate yellow from white and blue, despite lacking cones sensitive to the middle wavelengths.

This shows that losing the green/red cones does not eliminate yellow perception. Compensatory neural reorganization must enable the remaining blue cones to signal yellow indirectly. Similar findings are seen in dichromatic color blindness affecting green or red cones – yellow perception persists using the remaining cones.

These clinical examples further demonstrate we do not need dedicated yellow cones. Flexible retinal and cortical circuits allow color constancy, preserving the perception of yellow via alternate pathways when cone loss occurs. So even individuals lacking certain cone types retain a surprisingly vivid color experience through neural adaptation.


In summary, modern color science provides several explanations for how we see yellow without dedicated yellow-tuned photoreceptors:

– According to trichromatic theory, yellow is perceived by combined red and green cone activity.

– Opponent process theory proposes yellow is signaled in a retinal blue-yellow color channel.

– Retinal ganglion cells generate early color opponency, enabling yellow perception.

– Visual cortex mechanisms further refine neural representations of yellow.

– Cross-cultural studies reveal universal perceptual salience of yellow across languages.

– In dichromats and monochromats, the visual system compensates for cone loss to preserve yellow perception via alternate circuits.

So while yellow cone cells do not exist, the intricate retinal wiring and extensive cortical processing in the visual system allows us to reliably perceive yellow as a distinct color. Our subjective experience of yellow relies on complex neural transformations beginning in the eye but extending through multiple visual pathways into the brain.


[1] Young, T. (1802). On the theory of light and colours. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 12, 387–399.

[2] Hurvich, L. M., & Jameson, D. (1957). An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psychological Review, 64(6), 384-404.

[3] Dacey, D. M., & Packer, O. S. (2003). Colour coding in the primate retina: diverse cell types and cone-specific circuitry. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 421–427.

[4] Conway, B. R. (2009). Color vision, cones, and color-coding in the cortex. The Neuroscientist, 15(3), 274–290.

[5] Lindsey, D. T., Brown, A. M., Reijnen, E., Rich, A. N., Kuzmova, Y. I., & Wolfe, J. M. (2015). Color channels, not color appearance or color categories, guide visual search for desaturated color targets. Psychological science, 26(6), 788–797.